'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]' ------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { a(x1) -> x1 , a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1))))) , b(x1) -> a(x1)} Details: We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs: { a^#(x1) -> c_0() , a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} The usable rules are: { b(x1) -> a(x1) , a(x1) -> x1 , a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges: {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} ==> {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} ==> {a^#(x1) -> c_0()} {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} ==> {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} ==> {a^#(x1) -> c_0()} We consider the following path(s): 1) { b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} The usable rules for this path are the following: { b(x1) -> a(x1) , a(x1) -> x1 , a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs. 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { b(x1) -> a(x1) , a(x1) -> x1 , a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1))))) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {a(x1) -> x1} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {a(x1) -> x1} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} and weakly orienting the rules {a(x1) -> x1} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {b(x1) -> a(x1)} and weakly orienting the rules { b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {b(x1) -> a(x1)} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [12] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} and weakly orienting the rules { b(x1) -> a(x1) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [14] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [5] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment'' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} Weak Rules: { a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , b(x1) -> a(x1) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1} Details: The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment': 'Bounds with default enrichment' -------------------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} Weak Rules: { a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , b(x1) -> a(x1) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1} Details: The problem is Match-bounded by 0. The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton: { c_0(3) -> 3 , a^#_0(3) -> 4 , b^#_0(3) -> 7 , c_2_0(4) -> 7} 2) { b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} The usable rules for this path are the following: { b(x1) -> a(x1) , a(x1) -> x1 , a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs. 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { b(x1) -> a(x1) , a(x1) -> x1 , a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1))))) , a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules { a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: { a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} and weakly orienting the rules { a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {b(x1) -> a(x1)} and weakly orienting the rules { b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {b(x1) -> a(x1)} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} and weakly orienting the rules { b(x1) -> a(x1) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1))))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment'' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} Weak Rules: { a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , b(x1) -> a(x1) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} Details: The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment': 'Bounds with default enrichment' -------------------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {a(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(b(b(x1)))))} Weak Rules: { a^#(b(c(x1))) -> c_1(a^#(b(b(x1)))) , b(x1) -> a(x1) , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a(x1) -> x1 , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} Details: The problem is Match-bounded by 0. The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton: { c_0(3) -> 3 , a^#_0(3) -> 4 , c_0_0() -> 4 , b^#_0(3) -> 7 , c_2_0(4) -> 7} 3) {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Weak Rules: {} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 4) { b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1)) , a^#(x1) -> c_0()} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {a^#(x1) -> c_0()} Weak Rules: {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {a^#(x1) -> c_0()} and weakly orienting the rules {b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {a^#(x1) -> c_0()} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] b^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [12] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { a^#(x1) -> c_0() , b^#(x1) -> c_2(a^#(x1))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules